The same checks, now with an answer.
Enforcer applies the verdict Watchdog was already computing. One system at a time, in the order you choose, widening as your confidence does.
- Every answer scoped to a personAn agent returns what the human behind it could have found alone. Nothing more.
- Turn it on where you chooseConnector by connector, in your order. Nothing enters the path of a system you have not picked.
- Nothing disappears silentlyEvery withholding is logged with its reason, so a scoped answer never looks like a broken system.
What it does.
An agent acting for a person returns what that person could have found on their own. Nothing more, and the difference is written down.
Decides what comes back
The same check Watchdog was writing down, now with an answer. Scoped to the person the agent is acting for.
Connector by connector
You choose what it decides on, and in what order. Nothing goes in the path of a system you have not chosen.
Logs what it withheld
A refusal nobody can see is indistinguishable from a system being broken. Every withholding is on the record, with its reason.
The order matters more than the destination.
Nobody puts a new layer in front of production traffic on a hunch. By the time enforcement is a decision, the record has already told you what it costs.
Start where the record is loudest
The system whose answers Watchdog shows reaching furthest past the person asking. You already know which one it is by the time you get here.
Compile the constraint into the query
The search only considers material the caller could have reached alone. Nothing sensitive is retrieved and then filtered — the difference between never returned and returned then hidden.
Widen as the record earns it
Each connector you turn on has months of verdicts behind it saying what it would have changed. Enforcement is the confirmation of something you have already watched.
Two people ask one agent the same question. They get different answers.
That is the whole product in one frame. The head of finance asks what the agent knows about an account and gets everything in scope. Someone in support asks the same question and gets the part they could have found themselves.
Neither of them is told the system is broken, and the difference between the two answers is on the record with the reason beside it.